Showing posts with label MXNet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MXNet. Show all posts

Sunday, September 18, 2022

Generative AI with Kafka & Spark

Target audience: Advanced
Estimated reading time: 6'

While Python is predominantly recognized as the go-to programming language for data science, leveraging Java-based frameworks can offer substantial advantages, especially for rapid distributed inference.

In this article, we will outline the structure of a swift, distributed inference system for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) models [ref 1], harnessing the capabilities of Apache Spark, Kafka, and the Deep Java Library (DJL).


Table of contents
     Architecture
Follow me on LinkedIn

What you will learn: How to leverage Apache Kafka, Spark & Deep Java Library for faster inference on transformer models.

Notes:
  • This article doesn't delve into the specifics of Apache Spark, Kafka, Deep Java Library, or BERT individually. Instead, it focuses on how these components are integrated to create an efficient solution for inference tasks.
  • Development environments: JDK 11, Scala 2.12.15, Apache Spark 3.3.1, Apache Kafka 2.8.0, Deep Java Library 0.20.0
  • Comments and ancillary code are omitted for the sake of clarity.
  • Source code available at https://github.com/patnicolas/bertspark

Combining the best of both worlds

Python is a popular environment for developing and training deep learning models like TensorFlow, PyTorch, and MXNet. As an interpreted language, it offers data scientists the flexibility of notebooks for interactive development, evaluation, and refinement of neural models. Python boasts an extensive library encompassing natural language processing, machine learning models, statistical algorithms, and data management tools.

However, this dynamic development environment faces two significant challenges in runtime inference:
  1. Python's limited capacity for task parallelization, whether through concurrent threads or distributing tasks across a network.
  2. Commercial applications often depend on web services running on Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and make extensive use of Apache's open-source libraries.
This raises the question: Can we use Python to define, train, and evaluate deep learning models, and then employ JVM-based languages for real-time inference?

The solution hinges on the fact that deep learning frameworks like PyTorch and TensorFlow are fundamentally binary executables written in C++. The binary versions of these deep learning libraries can be accessed by both Python and Java through their respective interfaces.

Java/Scala for inference

As mentioned earlier, Python frameworks are frequently employed for training deep learning models. However, when it comes to deployment into production (specifically for inference purposes), these models need to be merged with current applications that are written in Java or Scala. This integration often involves utilizing data processing frameworks like Flink, Presto, or Spark.

This particular study concentrates on the integration of a BERT model into an existing Spark application. Apache Spark is renowned for its ability to rapidly process large datasets concurrently across multiple distributed services, as noted [ref 1]. Meanwhile, the Deep Java Library serves as a Java library that implements the most popular deep learning models, providing access via a Java native interface.

Training (Python) and Inference (Java/Scala) stack


Apache Spark and Amazon's Deep Java Library (DJL) tackle the two main challenges associated with deploying machine learning models in production that were developed using Python.

Typically, the process involves creating models in a Python environment like Jupyter, an IDE, or Anaconda, and then saving the model parameters. DJL then takes over by loading these saved parameters and initializing the inference model, which is then ready to handle runtime requests.

Distributed inference pipeline

The goal is to utilize Apache Spark for distributed computation and Kafka for asynchronous, or non-blocking, data queuing.
By integrating these two technologies, we can enhance the scalability of predictions by parallelizing the execution of deep learning models. The critical components of this distributed inference pipeline include:
  • Apache Spark: This tool segments runtime requests for predictions into batches. These batches are then processed concurrently across remote worker nodes.
  • Apache Kafka: This acts as an asynchronous messaging queue, effectively separating the client application from the inference pipeline, ensuring smooth data flow without bottlenecks.
  • Deep Java Library (DJL): It connects with the binary executables of the deep learning models.
  • Kubernetes: This system containerizes the instances of the inference pipelines, facilitating scalable and automated deployment. Notably, Spark version 3.2 and later versions offer direct integration with Kubernetes.
  • Deep Learning Frameworks: This includes well-known frameworks like TensorFlow, MXNet, and PyTorch, which are part of the overall architecture.
Through this combination, we achieve a robust and scalable system for managing and executing deep learning model inferences efficiently.

Generic data flow for Inference of deep learning models with DJL

The two main benefits of such pipeline are simplicity (all tasks/processes run on JVM) and low latency.

Note: Spark and DJL can also be used in the training phase to distribute the training of a mini batch.

Apache Kafka

Apache Kafka is an open-source distributed event streaming platform for high volume data pipelines, streaming analytics, data integration, and mission-critical applications. Kafka supports event streaming ensures a continuous flow of data through a pipeline or sequence of transformation such as Extract, Transform and Load [ref 2].

First ,we construct the handler class, KafkaPrediction that

  1. consumes requests from Kafka topic consumeTopic
  2. invokes the prediction model and transformation, predictionPipeline
  3. produces prediction into Kafka topic produceTopic
The actual request is wrapped into the consumed message, RequestMessage. Same for the prediction produced back to the Kafka queue.

class KafkaPrediction(
 consumeTopic: String,
 produceTopic: String,
 predictionPipeline: Seq[Request] => Seq[Prediction])  {
     
      // 1 - Constructs the transform of Kafka messages for prediction
  val transform = (requestMsg: Seq[RequestMessage]) => {
      // 2- Invoke the execution of the pipeline
      val predictions = predictionPipeline(requestMsg.map(_.requestPayload))
      predictions.map(ResponseMessage(_))
  } 
    
    // 3- Build the Kafka consumer for prediction request
  val consumer = new KafkaConsumer[RequestMessage](
    RequestSerDe.deserializingClass,
    consumeTopic
  )
    // 4- Build the Kafka producer for prediction response
  val producer = new KafkaProducer[ResponseMessage](
     ResponseSerDe.serializingClass, 
     produceTopic
  )
  .....
}

  1. We first need to create a wrapper function, transform to generate a prediction. The  function converts a request message of type RequestMessage into a prediction of type ResponseMessage.
  2. The wrapper, transform invoke the prediction pipeline predictionPipeline after converting the messages of type RequestMessage consumed from Kafka into actual request (Request). The predictions are converted into message of type ResponseMessage produced to Kafka
  3. The consumer is fully defined by the de-serialization of data consumed from Kafka and its associated topic
  4. The producer serialized the response back to Kafka service.
def executeBatch(
  consumeTopic: String, 
  produceTopic: String, 
  maxNumResponses: Int): Unit = { 
 
   // 1 - Initialize the prediction pipeline
 val kafkaHandler = new KafkaPrediction(
    consumeTopic, 
    produceTopic, 
    predictionPipeline
  )

  while(running)  {
      // 2 - Pool the request topic (has its own specific Kafka exception handler)
   val consumerRecords = kafkaHandler.consumer.receive
 
   if(consumerRecords.nonEmpty) {
        // 3 - Generate and apply transform to the batch
     val input: Seq[RequestMessage] = consumerRecords.map(_._2)
     val responses = kafkaHandler.predict(input) 
 
     if(responses.nonEmpty) {
         // 4 - Produce to the output topic
         val respMessages = responses.map(
             response =>(response.payload.id, response)
         ) 
 
         // 5- Produce the batch of response messages to Kafka
        kafkaHandler.producer.send(respMessages)
             
        // 6 - Get confirmation from Kafka has indeed processed the response
        kafkaHandler.consumer.asyncCommit
     }
     else
        logger.error("No response is produced to Kafka")
   }
   kafkaHandler.close
}
  1. First we instantiate the Kafka message handler class, KafkaPrediction we created earlier
  2. At regular interval, we pull a batch of new requests from Kafka
  3. If the batch is not empty, we invoke the handler, predict to the prediction models
  4. Once done, we encapsulate the predictions into the ResponseMessage instances
  5. The messages are produced into the producer topic in the Kafka queue 
  6. Finally, Kafka acknowledges the correct reception of the responses, asynchronously.
Next, we leverage Spark to distribute the batch of requests across multiple computation nodes (workers)


Apache Spark

Apache Spark, an open-source distributed processing system, is adept at handling large-scale data sets. It leverages in-memory caching and refined query execution strategies for real-time analytics [ref 3].

In our specific use case, we employ Spark to distribute a batch of requests, which are sourced from Kafka, across a network. This setup enables the simultaneous execution of multiple BERT models. Such an architecture not only prevents a single point of failure, ensuring fault tolerance, but also permits the use of generic, cost-efficient hardware.

Leveraging Spark data set and partitioning is surprisingly simple.

def predict(
   requests: Seq[Request]
)(implicit sparkSession: SparkSession): Seq[Prediction] = {
  import sparkSession.implicits._

    // 1 - Convert request into a Spark data set
  val requestDataset = requests.toDS()

    // 2 - Execute the prediction by invoking the DJL model
  val responseDataset: Dataset[Prediction] = requestDataset(predict(_))

    // 3 - Convert Spark data set response 
  responseDataset.collect() 
}
  1. Once the spark session (context) is initiated, the batch of requests is converted into a data set, requestDataset
  2. Spark applies the prediction model (DJL) on each request on the partitioned data 
  3. Finally, the predictions are collected from the Spark worker nodes before been returned to the Kafka handler

Note: The Spark context is assumed to be created and passed as implicit parameter to the prediction method.

 

Deep Java Library

This component is crucial as it connects the flow of incoming and outgoing data with the deep learning models. The Deep Java Library (DJL) is an open-source Java framework that accommodates popular deep learning frameworks like MXNet, PyTorch, and TensorFlow.

DJL's capability to adapt to any hardware setup (be it CPU or GPU) and its integration with big data frameworks position it as an ideal choice for a high-performance distributed inference engine [ref 4]. The library is particularly well-suited for constructing transformer encoders like BERT or GPT, as well as decoders such as GPT and ChatGPT.

In this setup, the input tensors are processed by the deep learning models on a GPU. Importantly, the data is allocated in the native memory space, which is external to the JVM and its garbage collector. The DJL library supports native tensor types such as NDArray and lists of tensors like NDList, along with a straightforward memory management tool, NDManager.

The classifier operates on the Spark worker node. The following code snippet, though a simplified version, illustrates the steps involved in invoking a BERT-based classifier using the DJL framework. 

class BERTClassifier(
   minTermFrequency: Int, 
   path: Path)(implicit sparkSession: SparkSession) {

  // 1 - Manage tensor allocation as NDArray
  val ndManager = NDManager.newManager()
 
  // 2 - Define the configuration of the classifier
  val classifyCriteria: Criteria[NDList, NDList] = Criteria.builder()
     .optApplication(Application.UNDEFINED)
     .setTypes(classOf[NDList], classOf[NDList])
     .optOptions(options)
     .optModelUrls(s"file://${path.toAbsolutePath}")
     .optBlock(classificationBlock)
     .optEngine(Engine.getDefaultEngineName())
     .optProgress(new ProgressBar())
     .build()
 
  // 3- Load the model from a local file
  val thisModel = classifyCriteria.loadModel()

  // 4 - Instantiate a new predictor
  val predictor = thisModel.newPredictor()

  // 5 - Execute this request on this worker node
  def predict(requests: Request): Prediction = {
    predictor.predict(ndManager, requests)
  }

  // 6- Close resources
  def close(): Unit = {
    model.close()
    predictor.close()
    ndManager.close()
  }
}  
  1. Set the manager for tensor in native memory
  2. Configure the classifier with its related neural block (classificationBlock)
  3. Load the model (MXNet, PyTorch or TensorFlow) from local file
  4. Instantiate a predictor from the model
  5. Submit the request to the DL model and return a prediction
  6. Close all the resources allocated in the native memory at the end of the run
NoteDJL can be optionally used for training. 


Use case: BERT

In order to illustrate the application of Spark and DJL to BERT we consider a model to predict a topic given a document. 

Architecture

Our model has 3 components:
  • Text processor (Tokenizer, Document segmentation,...)
  • Pre-trained BERT
  • Fully-connected neural network classifier (supervised)

A transformer model consists of two main components: an encoder and a decoder. The encoder's role is to convert sentences and paragraphs into an internal format, typically a numerical matrix, that captures the context of the input. Conversely, the decoder interprets and reverses this process. When combined, the encoder and decoder enable the transformer to execute sequence-to-sequence tasks like translation. Interestingly, isolating the encoder part of the transformer provides insights into the context, enabling various intriguing applications.

BERT particularly capitalizes on the attention mechanism to gain a more nuanced understanding of language context. BERT is composed of several layers of encoder blocks. In this model, the input text is divided into tokens, akin to the traditional transformer model, and each token is subsequently converted into a vector at BERT's output.

BERT has been applied to various problems including the automation of medical coding [ref 5]

Neural blocks

The practice of arranging components of neural networks, such as layers and activation functions, into modular, reusable blocks is a common strategy to simplify and deconstruct complex models [ref 6] .

In DJL, a block is a composable function that forms a neural network. It can represent single operation, parts of a neural network, and even the whole neural network. What makes blocks special is that they contain a number of parameters that are used in their function and are trained during deep learning. As these parameters are trained, the functions represented by the blocks get more and more accurate.

The core purpose of a block is to perform an operation on the inputs, and return an output. It is defined in the forward method. The forward function could be defined explicitly in terms of parameters or implicitly and could be a combination of the functions of the child blocks. 

The following code snippet illustrates the composition of blocks for a transformer encoder using Deep Java Library blocks. The 3 main components are
  • Transformer, self-attention block with token, position and sentence order embeddings
  • Masked Language Model (MLM) block
  • Next Sentence Prediction (NSP) block
class CustomPretrainingBlock (
  bertModelType: String
  activationType: String,
  vocabularySize: Long) extends BaseNetBlock {
 
  // First block: BERT transformer
  val bertBlock = getBertConfig(bertModelType)
        .setTokenDictionarySize(Math.toIntExact(vocabularySize))
        .build
  val activationFunc: java.util.function.Function[NDArray, NDArray] = 
         ActivationConfig.getNDActivationFunc(activationType)

    // Second block: Masked Language Model
  val bertMLMBlock = new BertMaskedLanguageModelBlock(bertBlock, activationFunc)

   // Third: block: Next Sentence Predictor
  val bertNSPBlock = new BertNextSentenceBlock
  val pretrainingBlocks = new BERTPretrainingBlocks(
      ("transformer", bertBlock),
      ("mlm", bertMLMBlock),
      ("nsp", bertNSPBlock)
   )

  override protected def forwardInternal(
    parameterStore: ParameterStore,
    inputNDList: NDList,
    training : Boolean,
    params: PairList[String, java.lang.Object]): NDList

BERT has several models with various number of encoder blocks, attention heads, embedding sizes and dimensions.

def getBertConfig(bertModelType: String): BertBlock.Builder = bertModelType match {
  case `nanoBertLbl` => 
      // 4 encoders, 4 attention heads, embedding size: 256, dimension 256x4
    BertBlock.builder().nano()
  
  case `microBertLbl`=>
      // 12 encoders,8 attention heads, embedding size: 512, dimension 512x4
    BertBlock.builder().micro()
  
  case `baseBertLbl` =>
      // 12 encoders,12 attention heads, embedding size: 768, dimension 768x4
    BertBlock.builder().base()
  
  case `largeBertLbl` =>
      // 24 encoders,16 attention heads, embedding size: 1024, dimension 1024x4
    BertBlock.builder().large()
  
  case _ =>
}

The appendix provides a detailed implementation guide for executing the 'forward' method used in pre-training, written in Scala, for reference purposes.



Thank you for reading this article. For more information ...

References

[1BiDirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer 

Appendix

You can implement your own variant of BERT by overriding the method forwardInternal.

override protected def forwardInternal(
  parameterStore: ParameterStore,
  inputNDList: NDList,
  training : Boolean,
  params: PairList[String, java.lang.Object]): NDList = {

    // Dimension batch_size x max_sentence_size
  val tokenIds = inputNDList.get(0)
  val typeIds = inputNDList.get(1)
  val inputMasks = inputNDList.get(2)

    // Dimension batch_size x num_masked_token
  val maskedIndices = inputNDList.get(3)

  try {
    val ndChildManager = NDManager.subManagerOf(tokenIds)
    ndChildManager.tempAttachAll(inputNDList)

      // Step 1: Process the transformer block for Bert
    val bertBlockNDInput = new NDList(tokenIds, typeIds, inputMasks)
    val ndBertResult = transformerBlock.forward(parameterStore, bertBlockNDInput, training)

      // Step 2 Process the Next Sentence Predictor block
      // Embedding sequence dimensions are batch_size x max_sentence_size x embedding_size
    val embeddedSequence = ndBertResult.get(0)
    val pooledOutput = ndBertResult.get(1)

      // Need to un-squeeze for batch size =1,   (embedding_vector) => (1, embedding_vector)
    val unSqueezePooledOutput =
      if(pooledOutput.getShape.dimension() == 1) {
         val expanded = pooledOutput.expandDims(0)
         ndChildManager.tempAttachAll(expanded)
         expanded
      }
      else
         pooledOutput

      // We compute the NSP probabilities in case there are more than one single sentences
    val logNSPProbabilities: NDArray =
       bertNSPBlock.forward(parameterStore, new NDList(unSqueezePooledOutput), training)
                 .singletonOrThrow

        // Step 3: Process the Masked Language Model block
        // Embedding table dimension are vocabulary_size x Embeddings size
    val embeddingTable = transformerBlock
            .getTokenEmbedding
            .getValue(parameterStore, embeddedSequence.getDevice, training)

        // Dimension:  (batch_size x maskSize) x Vocabulary_size
    val logMLMProbabilities: NDArray = bertMLMBlock
        .forward(
           parameterStore,
           new NDList(embeddedSequence, maskedIndices, embeddingTable),
           training)
        .singletonOrThrow

        // Finally build the output
    val ndOutput = new NDList(logNSPProbabilities, logMLMProbabilities)
      ndChildManager.ret(ndOutput)
  }
  catch { ... }
}
  



---------------------------
Patrick Nicolas has over 25 years of experience in software and data engineering, architecture design and end-to-end deployment and support with extensive knowledge in machine learning. 
He has been director of data engineering at Aideo Technologies since 2017 and he is the author of "Scala for Machine Learning" Packt Publishing ISBN 978-1-78712-238-3

Friday, June 3, 2022

Manage Memory in Deep Java Library

Target audience: Advanced
Estimated reading time: 4'

This post introduces some techniques to monitor memory usage and leaks in machine learning applications using the Deep Java Learning (DJL) library [ref 1]. This bag of tricks is far from being exhaustive.


Table of contents

DJL is an open source framework to support distributed inference in Java for deep learning models such as MXNet, Tensor flow or PyTorch.
The training of deep learning models may require a very significant amount of floating computations which are best supported by GPUs. However, the memory model in JVM is incompatible with column-based resident memory requires by the GPU. 

Vectorization libraries such as Blast are implemented in C/C++ and support fast execution of linear algebra operations. The ubiquitous Python numerical library, numpy [ref 2] commonly used in data science is a wrapper around these low level math functions. The ND interface, used in DJL, provide Java developers with similar functionality.


NotesThe code snippets in this post are written in Scala but can be easily reworked in Java

The basics

Memory types
DJL supports monitoring 3 memory components
  • Resident Set Size (RSS) is the portion of the memory used by a process that is held in RAM memory and cannot be swapped. 
  • Heap is the section of memory used by object dynamically allocated
  • Non-heap is the section encompassing static memory and stack allocation

Tensor representation

Deep learning frameworks operations on tensors. Those tensors are implemented as NDArray objects, created dynamically from array of values (integer, float,...). NDManager is memory collector/manager native to the underlying C++ implementation of the various deep learning frameworks. Its purpose is to create and delete (close) NDArray instances. NDManager has a hierarchical (single root tree) structure the child manager can be spawn from a parent [ref 3].


Let's consider the following, simple example of the computation of the mean of a sequence of floating point values.
 
 
import ai.djl.ndarray.NDManager

// Set up the memory manager
val ndManager = ndManager.newBaseManager()
    
val input = Array.fill(1000)(Random.nexFloat())
// Allocate resources outside JVM
val ndInput = ndManager.create(input)
val ndMean = ndInput.means()
val mean = ndMean.toFloatArray.head

// Release ND resources
ndManager.close()
 

The steps implemented in the code snippet are:
  1. instantiates the root resource manager, ndManager
  2. creates an array of 1000 random floating point values
  3. convert into a ND array, ndInput
  4. computes the mean, ndMean
  5. convert back to Java data types
  6. and finally close the root manager.

The root NDManager can be broken down it child managers to allow a finer granularity of allocation and release of resources. The following method, computeMean, instantiates a child manager, subNDManager,  to compute the mean value.  The child manager has to be explicitly closed (releasing associated resources) before the function returns.
The memory associated with the local ND variables, ndInput and ndMean are automatically released when going out of scope.

 
import ai.djl.ndarray.NDManager

def computeMean(input: Array[Float], ndManager: NDManager): Float = 
   if(input.nonEmpty) {
      val subNDManager = ndManager.newSubManager()
      val ndInput = ndManager.create(input)
      val ndMean = ndInput.means()
      val mean = ndMean.toFloatArray.head
     
      subNDManager.close()
      mean 
////f// Local resources, ndInput and ndMean are released
     // when going out of scope
  }
  else
     0.0F 
  


JMX to the rescue

The JVM provides developers with the ability to access operating system metrics such as CPU, or heap consumption through the Java Management Extension (JMX) interface [ref 4]
The DJL class, MemoryTrainingListener, leverages JMX monitoring capability, It provides developers with a simple method, collectMemoryInfo to collect metrics

First we need to instruct DJL to enable collection of memory stats as a Java property

  
System.setProperty("collect-memory", "true") 
 

Similarly to the VisualVM heap memory snapshot, described in the next section, we can collect memory metrics (RSS, Heap and NonHeap) before and after each new NDArray object is created or released. 

  
def computeMean(
   input: Array[Float], 
   ndManager: NDManager, 
   metricName: String): Float = {
      
    val manager = ndManager.newSubManager()
    // Initialize a new metrics
    val metrics = new Metrics()

    //  Initialize the collection of memory related metrics
    MemoryTrainingListener.collectMemoryInfo(metrics)
    val initVal = metrics.latestMetric(metricName).getValue.longValue
      
    val ndInput = ndManager.create(input)
    val ndMean = ndInput.mean()

    collectMetric(metrics, initVal, metricName)
    val mean = ndMean.toFloatArray.head

    // Close the output array and collect metrics
    ndMean.close()
    collectMetric(metrics, initVal, metricName)
     
    // Close the input array and collect metrics
    ndInput.close()
    collectMetric(metrics, originalValue, metricName)
      
    // Close the sub manager and collect metrics
    ndManager.close()
    collectMetric(metrics, initVal, metricName) 
    mean
}

First we instantiate a Metrics that is passed along all the various snapshots. Given the metrics and current NDManager, we create a base line in heap memory size, initVal.  We then collect the value of the metric for each creation and release of NDArray instances (collectMetric) from our mean computation example.

Here is a simple snapshot method which compute the increase/decrease in heap memory from the base line.
 
 
def collectMetric(
  metrics: Metrics, 
  initVal: Long, 
  metricName: String): Unit = {

    MemoryTrainingListener.collectMemoryInfo(metrics)  
    val newVal = metrics.latestMetric(metricName).getValue.longValue
    println(s"$metricName: ${(newVal - initVal)/1024.0} KB")
}


Memory leaks detection

I have been a combination of several investigative techniques for estimating the source of a memory leak.

MemoryTrainingListener.debugDump
This method will dump basic memory and CPU stats into a local file for a given metrics

 
  MemoryTrainingListener.debugDump(metrics, outputFile)
  
 
Output
Heap.Bytes:72387328|#Host:10.5.67.192
Heap.Bytes:74484480|#Host:10.5.67.192
NonHeap.Bytes:39337256|#Host:10.5.67.192
NonHeap.Bytes:40466888|#Host:10.5.67.192
cpu.Percent:262.2|#Host:10.5.67.192
cpu.Percent:262.2|#Host:10.5.67.192
rss.Bytes:236146688|#Host:10.5.67.192
rss.Bytes:244297728|#Host:10.5.67.192

NDManager.cap

It is not uncommon to have a NDArray objects associated with a sub manager not been properly closed. One simple solution is to prevent allocating new objects into the parent manager.


 
// Protect the parent/root manager from
// accidental allocation of NDArray objects
 ndManager.cap()

 // Set up the memory manager
 val ndManager = ndManager.newBaseManager()

 val ndInput = ndManager.create(input)

  


Profilers
For reference, DJL introduces a set of experimental profilers to support investigation of memory consumption bottlenecks [ref 5]

VisualVM
We select VisualVM [ref 6] among the various JVM profiling solutions to highlight some key statistics in investigating a memory leak.  VisualVM is a utility that is to be downloaded for Oracle site. It is not bundled with JDK.

A simple way to identify excessive memory consumption is taking regular snapshots or dump of the objects allocated from the heap, as illustrated below.


VisualVM has an intuitive UI to drill down into the sequence or composite objects. Besides quantifying memory consumption during inference, the following details view illustrates the hierarchical nature of the ND manager.






Environments; JDK 11, Scala 2.12.15, Deep Java Library 0.20.0



---------------------------
Patrick Nicolas has over 25 years of experience in software and data engineering, architecture design and end-to-end deployment and support with extensive knowledge in machine learning. 
He has been director of data engineering at Aideo Technologies since 2017 and he is the author of "Scala for Machine Learning" Packt Publishing ISBN 978-1-78712-238-3